Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PR's avatar

Most of the citations are feminists websites.

There a strong root of feminist in the way they see males...

There is a continum of "let's change males, so they are more compationed, so we can accept them".

One website you cite even say "a new masculinity where men causes less harm and feel less pain" (sic!!).

It is condescending view of men. We care about men, not becuase of them, but because of women, or becuase we dont want them to be angry.

This view is lost, and we shall reject this view.

Men need to be men.

We compete.

We even surpass women: even now, where the state invests billions in women (more education, more public positions for women) the gender gap continues to be in favour of men. Without any help, without any support, men always surpasse women.

Not becuase they are better (they might be better in certain things), BUT because they dont have any support.

It is the lack of support what makes men better: we do not have any "Plan B". Not the state, not women.

We just need the State to stop helping women. Stop discriminating men. Stop devoting 1000 of millions of dollars to women. Either directly (women programmes) or indirectly (more education, more public possitions).

If women and men receive the same amount of public funding, men will not longer have any issue.

And of course, we need to allow mens spaces again.

Expand full comment
Ole Christian Bjerke's avatar

Welcome, and thanks for the kind reply! I know I really didn't address your actual article in the comment, but rather ranted a bit a out the cruel, cruel world in general (sorry about that!) But that is sort of a pet peevee for me (and here I go again). Anyway - I enjoy your articles (your audiobook is downloaded and ready to go - but news seems to get in the way (crazy world!). Take care!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts